video 1.0 SproutVideo SproutVideo https://sproutvideo.com <iframe class='sproutvideo-player' src='https://videos.sproutvideo.com/embed/729adcb41d1aedc8f8/83edb8feee564337' width='630' height='354' frameborder='0' allowfullscreen referrerpolicy='no-referrer-when-downgrade' title='Video Player'></iframe> 630 354 243.008 This video is adapted from 10.3390/ani16142232 Based on laboratory analyses of both vegan and meat-based pet foods, some studies have suggested pet food samples of either type to be nutritionally sound, while others have demonstrated nutritional flaws. However, a more systematic evaluation of the nutritional soundness of vegan and meat-based pet foods has been lacking. Consequently, this study sought to more comprehensively review relevant published studies to date. Overall, 54 suitable studies were located and assessed. In total, 81.5% of the studies found nutritional inadequacies in the pet foods they examined. These nutritional inadequacies spanned multiple pet food types—both vegan and meat-based, and both dog and cat food. The nutritional inadequacies concerned multiple nutrients. When considered overall, vegan diets were not more likely than meat-based diets to be nutritionally unsound. More testing of all pet food types is required to ensure these fulfil the nutritional needs of dogs and cats. Study: Mace J. L. Nicholles B. &amp; Knight A. (2026). How nutritionally sound is commercially available vegan pet food relative to meat-based pet food? A systematic review. Animals, 16(14),2232. https://cdn-thumbnails.sproutvideo.com/729adcb41d1aedc8f8/83edb8feee564337/0/w_1280/poster.jpg?v=1787229786 1280 720 729adcb41d1aedc8f8